Why does the Coast Guard generally avoid conducting consensual boardings in certain cases?

The Coast Guard generally avoids conducting consensual boardings in certain cases due to the potential drawbacks associated with this method, particularly regarding its time-consuming nature and effectiveness. When a boarding is consensual, it relies on the agreement of the vessel's operator, which may not always be forthcoming. This can lead to delays and complications, especially if the crew is hesitant or unwilling to cooperate.

Moreover, during the course of a boarding, preretinal checks and assessments are often needed to determine if a vessel poses a threat or if there are safety violations. Consensual boardings may not yield the rapid response required in heightened situations, particularly when immediate actions are needed to ensure safety or enforce maritime law.

In circumstances that require swift intervention, the Coast Guard may find it more effective to utilize other boarding methods—such as obtaining a warrant or relying on the authority provided by established maritime laws—rather than engaging in the uncertainties inherent in consensual boardings. Therefore, the process may sometimes be seen as inefficient when there are more direct and effective measures available for ensuring compliance and safety on the waters.